Despite experiencing unprecedented economic turbulence, New York City’s real estate scene continues to be a magnet for investors. As broad and unpredictable in its complexity as it may be, the attraction of property ownership as a source of enrichment remains. But, evolving developments and debates at the policy levels continue to overwhelm the fundamentally positive outlook many property owners have as they struggle to deal with increased administrative and financial challenges. Since our previous newsletter, a host of issues at federal, state and local levels have gained wide attention with colossal potential for complicating matters for individual and institutional real estate owners alike.
CAPITAL GAINS DEBATE CONTINUES - Capital gains and losses are a necessary and often misunderstood aspect of the overall tax generating system. As a seller, there are several repercussions one must consider when accepting an offer on a property, the costliest one being tax liabilities. During this busy mid-term election season, extension of the so called “Bush tax cuts” has become an important campaign issue. Current tax cuts are due to expire on December 31, 2010 unless Congress acts. Although most cuts implemented in the Bush-era retain bipartisan support, some members of Congress are adamantly against extending across-the-board cuts in their entirety. Republicans are pressing to extend all of the existing tax cuts for everyone, thereby sustaining the current maximum federal capital gains rate at 15%. They maintain that any increase in the capital gains tax rate will only serve to deter further investment and slow down fragile economic growth as Americans struggle to recover from the crippling recession. Most Democrats only favor extending cuts for individuals earning up to $200,000, or $250,000 for couples. This would allow reductions for higher income earners to lapse, thereby letting the capital gains tax rate increase to 20%. For some investors, uncertainty about the extension of current tax rates will likely contribute to their year-end financial strategies as they rush to sell their properties or assets before 2011 in order to capitalize on the benefits of securing the lower tax rate.
DHCR BECOMES PART OF A BROADER STATE AGENCY - Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) Commissioner Brian Lawlor and Governor Peterson announced consolidation of a number of housing agencies under a single leadership structure which is now called New York State Homes and Community Renewal (HCR). It will include DHCR, HFA, SONYMA, AHC, HTFC and others under its umbrella. According to their joint press release, with the strategic integration of the state’s affordable housing and community renewal programs, the agency is expected to leverage different partnerships, implement a range of various affordable housing issues, simplify application processes, and maximize opportunities for community development of affordable housing projects throughout the state. As an added benefit, officials anticipate increased efficiency and reduction of operating costs in the wake of the state’s escalating budget deficit. Click here to view details of the press release.
DOB REVEALS DANGERS OF ILLEGAL CONVERSIONS - Mayor Bloomberg and other city officials revealed results of an undercover investigation into illegal building conversions, warning landlords of severe consequences for those found in violation of safe occupancy laws. Apparently, this investigation began in May, when undercover agents posing as apartment hunters searched Craigslist ads to find lawbreaking landlords. Mayor Bloomberg repeated the longstanding mantra for the current administration’s efforts to increase affordable housing units for NY residents. Although non-conventional apartments in basements, cellars, garages and attics have often constituted legitimate sources of affordable housing for the poor, immigrants and student populations, the issue is that such dwellings now need to be brought up to code. The Mayor stressed that in addition to creating dangerous living conditions for the occupants of illegally subdivided residences, landlords also put the lives of neighbors and first responders at risk.
Many landlords complain that the City’s current building code requirements are so strict and complicated that they feel discouraged from even attempting legal alterations. Most property owners don’t even know the difference between cellars and basements and which one of the two could even meet the criteria for legalization. A cellar is typically more than 50% below ground and a basement is more than 50% above ground. However, mere distance from the ground is not an adequate determinant for legal and safe utilization – providing adequate air circulation, proper lighting and suitable means of egress are just some of the circumstances vital for the legalization process.
Of course, all conversions should begin with a review of the most recent Certificate of Occupancy so that usage of residential units conform with indicated designation. Whether the next step involves an erection of a dividing wall, or installation of plumbing or electrical systems, proper plan and work permits should be filed with the DOB and necessary sign-offs obtained thereafter. It should also be noted that in practice, it is not the contractor’s responsibility to obtain adequate permits, but rather the owner’s. Penalties for non-compliance can generate fines anywhere from $2,000 to $24,000. Click here or below to view details of the investigation.


